[Click here] to go back
to the Table of Contents
for the "Out of the Box"
Comprehension Essays.

The Message

Have you heard of the "Silent Majority"?

I am a member of the "Silent Minority."

I am so silent that when I am speaking, you cannot hear what I am "not saying."

What people are hearing is what I am "not saying."

(Others, who I am not speaking to, also believe they are hearing what I am "not saying" and I am not "not saying" it, or even interested that such a thing that they are hearing be heard.)

What I am "not saying," the Silent Minority is hearing.

And those against us ... do not hear we are here.

---

Huh?

What does this mean?

Those who understand it knows what it means.

Those who have no idea what this means ... cannot hear what this means.

What I am "not saying" is not meant for them.

Perhaps I am having a cognitive issue. Perhaps I am bat shit crazy (BSC). Perhaps I am not BSC "creative," but rather ... Insane.

Or, perhaps what is being addressed is Real. Perhaps what is Real is Unspoken.

---

Thoughts

Often, when people think about the advantages of Critical Thinking, and the things discovered or developed by people recognized as high calibur critical thinkers, they think of technical or scientific areas of advancement. There is more.

Critical thinking is a cognitive function. Being an independent Ensemble Filter, it can be applied over a broader range of areas than science and technology.

Critical thinkers may have talents in the arts, music, entertainment, language, the spiritual, the ability to inspire, etc. These areas also evolve over time. For any area to advance, its indoctrinations require challenge, going outside the box. Creative innovations are not developed by people who are quite comfortable with "the norm". One does not challenge, repurpose, or improve that which you are AOK with.

Consider what it may have been like for the first person to endeavor to develop a language to communicate with that went beyond the various grunts and squeals that we had become accustomed to and understood for millions of years prior.

He or she was probably considered strange (bat shit crazy.) Until it was found that broadened communication abilities had all sorts of competitve applications that improved survival. At that moment, embracing Extended Language seemed like an obvious thing to get about doing - for those who could. For those who could not - their lineage went extinct long, long ago. Outcompeted - by the innovation of language.

→    Does Critical Thinking play a role in comprehending the Unspoken Truth?    ←

ConserveLiberty considers this question more abstractly:

Is the Unspoken another area where what is Real can be discerned from what is Imagined?

How may one comprehend what is being shared as Real when it is being offered in an Unspoken communication?

Since we cannot validate what we are "hearing" that one is "not saying" is Real, how do we know that we've "got it right?" Especially when another "hears" what they are not hearing differently.

Only one understanding is Truthfully Intended. Any other is Not Truthfully Intended. How do we know "which is truthfully which"? Our comprehension, or the alternate?

Once we believe that we are "getting it", and that others also are "getting it", what do we do about the others who are not "getting it"? What do we do about the others who are not "getting it" but are certain that they do? (Belief in the False Understanding)

Is Tolerance helpful, or harmful? Harmony exists when tolerance of differences is in play (because all is different from all else). Yet, not all False Understandings promote innovations that are evolutionarily selective.

Conserve Liberty

---

(Please use your "BACK" function to return to the previous page.)

---